Wednesday 12 February 2014

Unpublished letter to the Vernon Morning Star

To many, the recent decision by Coldsream municipal district council not to ask the provincial government to study the single municipal government model for Greater Vernon came as no surprise. However, I was surprised that the elected officials of the Municipal district gave more credence to a group of fifty or so vocal residents opposed to even considering issue and less or no credence to the over 800 hundred Coldstream residents who signed the recent Greater Vernon Governance Society petition. This current Coldstream Council was unwilling to risk their political capital in an election year for what they perceive as an unnecessary move. Perhaps their lack of action is understandable but their lack of fortitude is unfortunate for the area. I believe is better to really know than think you know.
Following the rejection of the recent petition’s premise by the acclaimed representatives of Electoral Areas B and C one could be forgiven for thinking that the recent few months of political action by the Greater Vernon Governance Society while admirable has been futile. The need for unanimity among Greater Vernon’s regional partners certainly made the task seem doomed from the start. The question has recently been asked of writer; if you knew all along that they could pull the plug on your whole effort why did you even bother? Indeed. But I believe this issue will not and should not go away.
 People who move to Greater Vernon think that we need to give our heads a shake when they become aware of how many jurisdictions exist in our area: a system that we have inherited from the old ranching days of the North Okanagan. Change needs to come and will come eventually when elected officials have the courage to ask of the provincial government is there better way?
There yet remains one more voice to be heard; that of Vernon City Council. While the reception the Governance Society Leadership received when they presented the petition was warm and supportive no decision was taken at that time. It appeared that Council didn’t want to take that first step at the risk of offending our regional partners. This was certainly consistent action on the part our present Vernon City Council particularly when one considers the concessions made by Vernon in the new parks agreement. However let us return to the concept of political capital.
A very credible sample of the Vernon electorate supported a detailed look at how Greater Vernon is governed with a viable option put to a referendum. Our city council may choose not to offend the sensibilities of our neighbours by declining to make a request to the provincial government to look at the possibility of one municipality for Greater Vernon; but in so doing they would be forgetting that it was not the residents of Coldstream and B and C who elected them but rather the citizens of Vernon. Will our council be willing to ignore the petition as did Coldstream and face the criticism and perception that Vernon now dances to the tune of its regional partners? I think that Council certainly has better political option.
I believe that Vernon Council should respond to their own citizens by forwarding a request to the Provincial Government to look at the way the Greater Vernon is governed. Yes I know our Mayor thinks it would be illogical to make such a request without regional support but in light of the recent attention this issue has drawn, not to make the request would send the message that the citizens of Vernon think that things are just fine the way they are. This is certainly not the case as evidenced by the recent petition. Even if the request results in a polite letter from the ministry declining a study it could not hurt to ask. Making the request to truly understand the issues can only result in closer provincial scrutiny of the goings on at our Regional district and may lead the province to look at their own financial policies that help to perpetuate of our cumbersome system of local Governance. All in all a better way, I think, to spend political capital in an election year.
Cheers Shawn
Vernon Taxpayer





No comments: